Re: pose

{ brad brace } (bbrace@wired.com)
Mon, 13 Oct 1997 09:21:33 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: nik: "Re: Pose"
Previous message: Richard Povall: "Re: [From the dance-tech moderator] Personal mail on the list"
Next in thread: Darren Kelly: "Re: pose"

(Thanks Robert;) I'm just postulating about posing out-loud.... Wondering
if a (darkened) performance might consist of (technically detected, then
amplified and/or illuminated) movement as a consequence of a singular,
extended pose... and/or as a result of some impact or collision with the
pose...

{ brad brace } <<<< bbrace@netcom.com >>>> ~finger for pgp

The_12hr-ISBN-JPEG_Project ftp.wco.com/users/bbrace <<
> eccentric ftp.netcom.com/pub/bb/bbrace <
>> hypermodern ftp.teleport.com/users/bbrace <<
>> imagery online ftp.rdrop.com/pub/users/bbrace <<
>> all-the-time ftp.pacifier.com/pub/users/bbrace <<

Usenet-news: alt.binaries.pictures.12hr/ a.b.p.fine-art.misc
Mailing-list: listserv@netcom.com / subscribe 12hr-isbn-jpeg
Reverse Solidus: http://www.teleport.com/~bbrace/bbrace.html

Next message: nik: "Re: Pose"
Previous message: Richard Povall: "Re: [From the dance-tech moderator] Personal mail on the list"
Next in thread: Darren Kelly: "Re: pose"